Partitional Clustering

1. Partitional Clustering v.s. Hierarchical Clustering

  • Partitioning clustering: A division of data objects into non-overlapping subsets (clusters) such that each data object is in exactly one subset.
  • Hierarchical clustering: A set of nested clusters organized as a hierarchical tree.
2. Types of Cluster
  • Well-Separated Clusters: a cluster is a set of points such that any point in a cluster is closer (or more similar) to every other point in the cluster than any point not in the cluster.
  • Center-based Clusters: A cluster is a set of objects such that any point in a cluster is closer (more similar) to the “center” of a cluster, than to the center of any other cluster.
    • The center of a cluster is often a centroid, the average of all the points in the cluster, or a medoid, the most “representative” point of a cluster.
  • Contiguous Clusters (Nearest Neighbor or Transitive): A cluster is a set of points such that a point in a cluster is closer (or more similar) to one or more other points in the cluster than to any point not in the cluster.
  • Density-based: A cluster is a dense region of points, which is separated by low-density regions, from other regions of high density. 
    • Used when cluster are irregular or intertwined.
  • Shared Property or Conceptual Clusters: Finds clusters that share some common property or represent a particular concept.
  • Cluster Defined by an Objective Function:
    • Finds clusters that minimize or maximize an objective function
    • Enumerate all possible ways of dividing points into clusters and evaluate the “goodness” of each potential set of clusters by using the given objective function (NP hard).
    • Can have global or local objectives
      • hierarchical clustering algorithms typically have local objectives
      • partitional algorithms typically have global objectives
    • A variant of the global objective function approach is to fit the data to a parameterized model
      • parameters for the model are determined from the data
      • mixture models assume that the data is a “mixture” of a number of statistical distributions. 
    • Map the clustering problem to a different domain and solve a related problem in that domain
      • proximity matrix defines a weighted graph, where the nodes are the points being clustered, and the weighted edges represent the proximities between points. 
      • Clustering is equivalent to breaking the graph into connected components, one for each cluster.

3. K-means Clustering

  • Code
  • Initial centroids are often chosen randomly. 
    • Clusters produced  vary from one run to another.
  • The centroid is (typically) the mean of the points in the cluster.
  • “Closeness” is measured by Euclidean distance, cosine similarity, correlation, etc.
  • K-means will converge for common similarity measures mentioned above.
  • Most of the converge happens in the few iterations.
    • often the stopping condition is changed to “until relatively few points change clusters”
  • Complexity is O(n*k*i*d)
    • n: number of points
    • k: number of clusters
    • i: number of iterations
    • d: number of attributes
4. Evaluating K-means Clustering
  • Most common measure is Sum of Squared Error (SSE)
    • for each point, the error in the distance to the nearest cluster
    • to get SSE, we square these errors and sum them
      • SSE = sum^k_{i=1} sum_{x in C_i} dist^2(m_i,x)
      • where x is the data point in cluster C_i and m_i is the representative point for cluster C_i
5. Problem with Selecting Initial Points
  • If there are K “real” clusters then the chance of selecting one centroid from each cluster is small
    • Chances is relatively small when K is large. 
    • If clusters are the same size, n, then
        • P = frac{ mbox{number of ways to select one centroid from each cluster}}{mbox{number of ways to select K centroids}} = frac{K!n^K}{(Kn)^K} = frac{K!}{K^K}
  • Solutions to Initial Centroids Problem
    • Multiple runs: helps, but probability is not on your side
    • Sample and user hierarchical clustering to determine initial centroids
    • Select more than k initial centroids and then select among these initial centroids
      • select most widely separated
    • Postprocessing
    • Bisecting K-means
      • Not as susceptible to initialization issues
6. Handling Empty Clusters
  • Basic K-means algorithm can yield empty clusters
  • Several strategies
    • Choose the point that contributes most to SSE
    • Choose a point from the cluster with the highest SSE
    • If there are several empty clusters, the above can be repeated several times
7. Updating Centers Incrementally
  • In the basic K-means algorithm, centroids are updated after all points are assigned to a centriod
  • An alternative is to update the centriods after each assignment (incremental approach)
    • each assignment updates zero or two centroids
    • more expensive
    • introduces an order dependency
    • never get an empty cluster
    • can use “weights” to change the impact
8. Pre-processing and Post-processing
  • Pre-processing
    • normalize the data
    • eliminate outliers
  • Post-processing
    • Eliminate small clusters that may represent outliers
    • Split “loose” clusters, i.e., clusters with relatively high SSE
    • Merge clusters that are “close” and that have relatively low SSE
    • Can use these steps during the clustering process
      • ISODATA
9. Bisecting K-means
  • Bisecting K-means algorithm
    • variant of K-means that can produce a partitional or a hierarchical clustering
10. Limitations of K-means
  • K-means has problems when clusters are of differing
    • sizes
    • densities
    • non-globular shapes
  • K-means has problems when the data contains outliers.
  • One solution is to use many clusters
    • find parts of clusters, but need to put together

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*